The problem
Lesson 1, lesson 2, lesson 3. You are not allowed to open lesson 4 until you have passed lesson 3, and lesson 3 is about colours, which you could not care less about. You feel an old school irritation rising: someone is telling you what to do, in what order, at what pace. So you do what you have always done with people who order you around: you drag your feet, then you disappear.
That is not bad attitude. It is a need for autonomy, and it can be fed.
What the research found
Erika Patall, Harris Cooper and Jorgianne Robinson (2008) gathered 41 studies, 46 samples in all, on a simple question: what happens when you let someone choose, even a detail, instead of imposing everything? They looked at intrinsic motivation, meaning the wish to do an activity for its own sake, but also at effort, performance and the sense of competence. The overall result is modest but clear: giving choice produces an average effect of d = 0.30 on these measures, in favour of the people who choose. Two useful details: the effect is stronger when several small successive choices are offered, between two and four, rather than a long list, and it is stronger when no external reward gets involved. The mechanism, according to the authors, lies in feeling that you are the origin of what you do: an activity you chose becomes yours, and you stand by it.
For French specifically, Kimberly Noels, Richard Clément and Luc Pelletier (1999) surveyed 78 English-speaking students enrolled in a six-week French immersion course at the University of Ottawa. They measured how the students perceived their teacher, more or less controlling, more or less informative, and what kind of motivation they had. The more controlling students found their teacher, the less intrinsic motivation they felt and the more anxious they were in class. Conversely, those who felt they had chosen to learn for themselves, and who learned for the pleasure of it, made more effort, intended more strongly to carry on and felt less anxious. Control imposed from outside does not make people work more: it makes them enjoy it less.
Do this today
Take whatever you use to learn, an app, a textbook, a channel, and make three choices in five minutes. First, the order: open what draws you, not what comes next. Then, the cut: find one thing you hate, the dictation, the verb list, and decide to skip it this week. Finally, the form: reading, listening or speaking, up to you. Write these three decisions down. They make this path yours.
How our lessons use it
Nothing is locked with us. You can start with “Je m’appelle Nadia”, read the story, hide it, recall three details and say three sentences about yourself; or you can start with the video “L’ascenseur” while walking, and only do the version with pauses if repeating appeals to you. You can skip “Dis-le à ta façon” if you do not feel like speaking today, and come back to it another day. The order is yours. Start with Je m’appelle Nadia (A1), or don’t.
The honest limit
An effect of d = 0.30 is real but small: choice helps, it does not transform everything. Patall and colleagues’ meta-analysis mixes laboratory tasks and school activities, often with children, for whom the effect is stronger than for adults. Noels and colleagues’ study is a questionnaire survey of 78 people in immersion, which shows links, not causes. Choosing freely does not replace regularity: it makes regularity easier to love.
Your questions
If I skip what I don't like, won't I have gaps?
Maybe, and that is fine. What you skip today you will meet again in another story. A gap in a path you keep walking is better than a complete path you have abandoned.
Doesn't too much choice paralyse you?
It does. Patall and colleagues' meta-analysis finds the effect is best with a few successive choices, two to four, rather than a long list. Choose between two or three things, not fifty.
References
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers' communicative style and students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23–34. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00003
You may also like
LE LABO · Nº 16
I don't have time — a ten-word sentence that fits French into your day ↗
LE LABO · Nº 17